I am looking into dropship and have read through all the T&C's for various dropshippers. Some accept returns (if unwanted) some dont (only if they are faulty) should all dropshippers accept non wanted returns ???
Are they under any legal obligation to ???
What you should look at is the law (although rarely looks like it in public view) will try to see the common sense. So there is no determinate answer as I see it. Because, there has been such a rapid growth in dropshipping and the genuine dropshippers of before and now.
So, if you go to an 'old school' wholesaler who offers dropshipping then he may have only ever have dealt with b2b terms and that would be all that should be applied.
If you go to some of the more modern dropshippers who act as middleman then I ain't got a clue.
If you have a dropshipper who you know has an active retail (sells to end users) department then here's the grey area. If they applied the DSR's to their own retail outlets but then when doing the exact same for you, i.e sending goods to an end user, but tried to negage responsibility to DSR's because you are acting as a middleman then there is room for debate.
A company would not be looked on favourably by any court if they had one rule for themselves and then another for their "agents". Even worse if they were a company that offered a whole package where you sign up to them for your own e-store and they populate it with their goods and they host the site and all the support is from them. If they then tried to give different terms to your customers compared to their retail end users then I'm sure they would have a problem because it looks like a deliberate attempt at negating rather than self protection. They hold the goods and send the goods to the end user. Self protection in a b2b relation therefore is very limited since really you are acting like an agent. If, for example, they were to say that they don't compy with the 7 day rule that someone can change their mind and return I cannot believe they would get away with that. It is an implied condition. They shouldn't send to an end user (even if they try and say "on someone's else's behalf") if they don't want to be mixed up with that.
Not really been tested though so sensible thing is to think as above and take it all literal. If they say they don't offer full customer rights yet they sell to end users and therefore do offer it, then should you be trading with them?